▶ Video explainer coming soon
The court sided with the landscaping company. It found solid evidence that the company never removed snow from, or piled snow onto, that landscaped strip. That job simply wasn't part of its contract. Testimony from the injured woman's employer didn't create any real doubt about this. Since she couldn't show the company actually caused the icy condition, her case against it was dismissed. The appeals court agreed with the lower court's decision, upholding the dismissal.
A woman slipped on ice between two parked cars at her job's parking lot. Right before falling, she had walked over a two- to three-foot snow pile on a landscaped strip. That strip separated her employer's lot from a neighboring lot. A landscaping company had a contract to remove snow from her employer's lot, but not from the neighboring lot. She sued the landscaping company, claiming it was negligent and created the dangerous ice. Her case was combined with another lawsuit against different defendants. The landscaping company asked the court to dismiss the claims against it.
Under New York law, a contract alone usually doesn't make a company liable to outside third parties. But there's an exception: if the company's careless work actually created the danger, it can still be held responsible. The question here was whether the landscaping company created the icy condition by piling snow on that landscaped strip.
This case shows how courts look closely at who actually created a hazard, not just who had a nearby contract. Companies hired for specific tasks, like snow removal in one area, may not be liable for conditions outside that scope. For injury claims involving contractors, proving who caused the hazard is often the key legal battle.
Talk to a licensed personal injury lawyer in New York.