▶ Video explainer coming soon
The appeals court agreed with the lower court. It ruled that the hospital and doctors provided strong evidence, including medical records and expert opinions. This evidence showed they met the standard of care. It also showed that tPA and clot surgery were not safe options for this patient. The plaintiff's expert affidavit did not properly challenge these findings. The court said the expert's opinions were not based on facts supported by evidence in the record. The expert also did not explain the scientific basis for the conclusions. Because of this, the plaintiff could not show a real factual dispute. The court affirmed dismissal of the case against these defendants.
In January 2016, a patient went to the emergency department at Northern Westchester Hospital. Doctors found he had suffered a stroke. His family later sued the hospital and several doctors. They claimed the medical team failed to diagnose the stroke quickly enough. They also claimed doctors failed to run needed tests. And they said the patient should have received a clot-dissolving drug called tPA, or a surgical procedure to remove the clot. The patient died after the lawsuit began. His estate's administrator continued the case in his place. A lower court dismissed the case against several defendants. The plaintiff appealed that decision.
In medical malpractice cases, the defense must show either they followed the correct standard of care, or that their actions did not cause the patient's injuries. If they do this, the burden shifts to the plaintiff. The plaintiff must then present expert evidence that raises a real factual dispute. The question here was whether the plaintiff's expert evidence was strong enough to challenge the defense experts and let the case go to trial.
This case shows why expert testimony matters so much in malpractice claims. Courts look closely at whether expert opinions are backed by real evidence and clear scientific reasoning. Without that support, a case can be dismissed before it ever reaches a jury, even in serious situations involving a patient's death.
Talk to a licensed medical malpractice lawyer in New York.