▶ Video explainer coming soon
The appeals court agreed with the lower court and upheld the dismissal. It found the college gave a valid, non-discriminatory reason for ending the stipends tied to administrative positions. The employees did not provide enough evidence to show this reason was fake. For the retaliation claim, the court found the college also gave legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons for removing Niemotko from her position. Again, the employees failed to show these reasons were pretext for retaliation. Because they could not create a real factual dispute on these key points, the case was dismissed.
Tracey Niemotko, Moira Tolan, and Ilona McGuiness worked at Mount Saint Mary College. They sued the college and several administrators in 2019. They claimed gender discrimination under New York's Human Rights Law. McGuiness said she was forced to quit because of her gender. Niemotko and Tolan said they were removed from administrative roles and lost their stipends because they were women. Niemotko also claimed she was removed as Chair of the School of Business in retaliation for complaining about gender discrimination. The college asked the court to dismiss the whole case before trial. A lower court agreed and dismissed everything. The employees appealed that decision.
The main question was whether the college had real, non-discriminatory reasons for its actions. Under New York law, once an employee shows possible discrimination, the employer can win by proving a legitimate reason. Then the employee must show that reason was just an excuse, called a pretext, hiding the real discriminatory motive.
This case shows how New York courts evaluate workplace discrimination and retaliation claims. Employers can win dismissal by showing legitimate business reasons for their actions. Employees must then present real evidence, not just claims, that those reasons are false. This standard applies broadly to employment discrimination cases across the state.
Talk to a licensed employment law lawyer in New York.