▶ Video explainer coming soon
The appeals court said no. Under New York law, when a party dies, the court loses power to act in the case until someone is properly substituted for that person. Because the defendants' motions to dismiss were filed after Roe died but before his estate's administrator was substituted, the lower court should not have ruled on those motions at all. The appeals court reversed part of the lower court's order. It also granted the request to formally substitute Roe's estate administrator as a plaintiff.
In 2001, Cheryl Lee and Charles Roe hired the law firm Leeds, Morelli & Brown to handle their employment discrimination claims against Bear Stearns. In 2002, both signed settlement agreements. In 2005, Lee and Roe sued the law firm and Bear Stearns. They claimed the firm secretly worked with Bear Stearns to cap employee payouts and protect the company from bigger claims. They said the firm promised to fight for them but instead pushed them into a weak settlement. While the case was pending, Roe died. Later, Deborah Roe became the administrator of his estate and asked to be substituted as a plaintiff in his place.
The defendants asked the court to dismiss the case before Roe's estate was properly substituted as a party. The main legal question was whether the court could even rule on those dismissal motions after Roe had died, but before his estate representative had officially joined the case.
This ruling highlights a key procedural rule: courts cannot move forward on major motions involving a deceased party until that party's estate is properly substituted. For clients working with law firms on discrimination or settlement matters, this case shows how procedural steps can shape whether claims survive a client's death.
Talk to a licensed employment law lawyer in New York.